I didn't really have gripes with Asset, it ran just fine for me as a headless server, but in the end I decided to go with the Raspberry Pi version of JRiver and it offers the choice of headless or GUI, I opt for the GUI even though typically barely ever look at it. I wouldn’t expect you to go out and buy a new server to try my theory, and if I were you I’d probably cut my losses and go with minimserver and the Lumin app.Click to expand.Both MinimServer and AssetUPnP have supported DSD for a very long time now, though in the case of Asset only the paid or "Premium" version. So apart from the Jcat card it was a matter of reconfiguring what I already had. But after I got the 505 I got decent gains from pulling it all together. i7 8700 processor, 8gb RAM, completely silent.įinally, what I will say is that my system came together over a period of time and I kept my server away for a lot of that time. All music is held internally on my ROCK server. The switch is connected to both my server with the JCAT card and my NT-505 by short cat8 patch cables (they are thin and neat). I can’t explain why this might work, but your best sound is playing everything locally and the bigger you make your network the worse it sounds. That is how I got the best sound out of my setup together with a specialist network card on my server (Jcat Net Femto). If it were me I’d pull it all in to the same space with short hops and all powered with LPSU’s. Close to the NT-505, maybe with a linear PSU. You need a switch between your NT-505 and your office. I can tell you that, for my ears, no difference in PSAudio (roon x minimserver), no difference in dcs (roon x minimserver), hqplayer is better in sonore ultrarendu (roon x minimserver x hqplayer). I am not very knowledgeable also, and I can only share my personal experience and the experience of others that I see in different fora. Apart from different loudness (a louder source will be perceived as better), I can only imagine that might be some difference in implementation between the roon code and the upnp code, that favors the upnp. But I have no experience with your endpoint/streamer. That is basically what Andrew is telling us, from a dcs perspective (that matches my opinion). You see, the code to act as a roon endpoint is different from the code to act as an upnp endpoint, and also is different from the code to act as a HQPlayer endpoint.įor equal level implementations, one should not hear any difference in SQ. Or it’s the way the code is implemented, as I understand that your upstream chain is the same to minimserver and to roon. My guess is that the “RAAT” protocol implementation makes all the difference. Then, moving to the dcs vivaldi, all things are equal again. Moving to the rendu line, HQPlayer was way better than roon or minimserver. My experience is that, with the psaudio bridge (in the directstream dac) upnp (minimserver) was about the same as roon. Should you get a rendu, you could try the Roon+HQplayer solution. It may as simple as a respberry (for comparing roon to minimserver), more elaborate as a SOtM or a Sonore Rendu ,or the fanciest type like a dcs bridge or an innuos server. nice app, and works well.įinally, should you have one at hand, or the possibitliy to borrow from someone, try a different renderer. cat7 are grounded lan cables, and they maight be injecting noise into your system, connecting your router ground to your TEAC ground (that is one possible explanation o perceived better SQ on a USB stick than any of your solutions via ethernet).Īlso, as said before, be sure to exatly level match your minimserver and roon. Try swapping your last cat7 cable for cat5e or 6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |